Skip to Content

Related News

  • Related News

  • Last Call for EWEB/Lane County Septic Grants

    Holiday Farm Fire recovery program now eligible for businesses, residential property owners who purchased post-fire, to cover inspection costs and new construction

    Find Out More
  • EWEB Pilots New Line Safety Program for 4th graders.

    This year, EWEB is ramping up power line safety for children, specifically 4th graders.

    Find Out More
  • Improving habitat resiliency throughout the Upper McKenzie

    Environmental Responsibility is a core guiding value for EWEB decision-making. This summer, EWEB continues its commitment to environmental stewardship with a robust slate of habitat enhancement updates throughout the upper McKenzie River, across the footprint of the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project.

    Find Out More
  • EWEB weighs multi-billion-dollar decision affecting energy supply

    EWEB is weighing energy supply decisions that will cost nearly $2 billion over the next two decades.

    Find Out More
  • Habitat Restoration Underway on McKenzie River

    Partners at EWEB, McKenzie River Trust, the McKenzie Watershed Council, and the U.S. Forest Service broke ground on a major floodplain restoration project in Quartz Creek.

    Find Out More
  • Show More
EWEB, Lane County host open house to gather feedback for “Leaburg Transportation Alternatives Analysis”

June 16, 2025 Adam Spencer, Communications Specialist

With the decommissioning and eventual removal of the Leaburg Dam, the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) is collaborating with Lane County Public Works (LCPW) to explore options to maintain access from Highway 126 across the McKenzie River to Leaburg Dam Road.

EWEB, in coordination with LCPW, hired the engineering firm DOWL to lead a “Triple Bottom Line” evaluation of potential options. While the cost (traditionally called “the bottom line”) to implement the chosen solution will play a major factor in the decision, the social and environmental impacts are important considerations, too. A “Triple Bottom Line” decision seeks to balance these three major categories: Economics, Environment, Social Impacts.

DOWL has calculated the baseline costs to design and build several options to resolve this problem and is now soliciting feedback from community members on the social impacts each option could bring. Social impacts include safety, resiliency to major disruptions, recreational impacts, and livability.

EWEB hosted an open house on Saturday, June 14 at Lloyd Knox Park to share information and gather public feedback. About 40 people attended between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.

Posters sharing information about the “Leaburg Transportation Alternatives Analysis” will be on display at the Lloyd Knox Park Visitor’s Pavilion until July 25 so park visitors can learn about each option and provide their feedback.

Community members are invited to learn more at eweb.org/leaburgbridge. Feedback can be submitted by calling EWEB Generation Planner Jeremy Somogye at 541-685-7439 or by emailing LeaburgInfo@eweb.org.

The public input session will close on July 25. Then, DOWL and subcontractor Parametrix will evaluate further engineering cost estimations and public feedback to compile a report to support decision makers by this fall.

Background

When EWEB built the Leaburg Dam in the early 1930s, it built a bridge on top so dam operators could access the south side of the McKenzie River to manage the facility.

What came to be known as Leaburg Dam Road extended beyond the EWEB property as the original Carol Lieberg property was subdivided into more than a dozen residential properties along the Leaburg Reservoir. In 1953, the Army Corps of Engineers built the Leaburg Hatchery on the east side of the river, connecting Fish Hatchery Road to thousands of acres of private timber lands and Whitewater Ranch – a historic farm that produces blueberries today.

With the decommissioning of the Leaburg Hydroelectric Project – due primarily to the prohibitively high costs to address structural issues throughout the Leaburg Canal – EWEB will no longer be able to provide the beneficial use of the bridge for the neighborhood.

Now the primary question the Triple Bottom Line aims to inform is: “What is the Future of the Leaburg Dam Bridge?”

Should there be a new bridge in the same location? Should these roads be connected to nearby bridges? Can the concrete piers of the dam be modified and remain in the river to continue to support a bridge? Are there better locations for a bridge? What are the costs? How will the community and the environment be impacted by these options?

Proposed Options

EWEB, in coordination with Lane County, hired the engineering firm DOWL to assess several options:

  1. Option 1: Restore the existing Leaburg Dam Road Bridge (the steel part and roadway surface above the dam roll gates) to an improved standard for ongoing functionality.
  2. Option 2: Replace the existing bridge spans and superstructure (the steel part and roadway surface) in its current location while using or modifying the existing sub-structure (the concrete structures in the water).
  3. Option 3: Permanently remove the existing bridge and develop a connection between Leaburg Dam Road and Goodpasture Bridge via Leashore Drive.
  4. Option 4: Permanently remove the existing bridge and develop a connection between Leaburg Dam Road and Deerhorn Road providing access to Bridge Street Bridge and Holden Creek Lane.
  5. Option 5: Remove and replace the existing bridge with new bridge in its current location.
  6. Option 6: Permanently remove the existing bridge and build a new bridge off of Fish Hatchery Road to connect to Highway 126 via Evans Lane over the Leaburg Canal. (The DOWL team developed this additional option after seeing the lay of the land).

Baseline Cost Estimates

DOWL prepared baseline cost estimations to design and construct each option. The cost estimations do not include other costs that may occur (such as purchasing easements to cross or to permanently own properties, if needed) to build a chosen alternative.

The high costs to build Option 2 and Option 4 made them too expensive to merit further exploration.

DOWL also calculated the costs to combine Option 3 with the other options that would keep a bridge connecting Leaburg Dam Road to Highway 126. The purpose would be to provide connectivity for emergency evacuations should a wildfire, earthquake or other disaster incapacitate the Goodpasture Bridge:

Baseline Cost Estimates table of Leaburg Transportation Alternatives Analysis

Outreach

EWEB and Lane County have been communicating primarily with the residents most-impacted by this decision. Residents of Leaburg Dam Road, Fish Hatchery Road, Leashore Drive, Goodpasture Road, Deerhorn Road, and Holden Creek Lane received letters in September 2024 and in March of this year to inform them of the study and initial baseline cost estimations.

Residents were also invited to a May 5 virtual meeting to go over each proposed option and the costs to kick-off the gathering of public feedback.

EWEB updated community members at the May 15 McKenzie Valley Customer Appreciation Dinner at the Walterville Community Center. Leading up to Saturday’s open house, EWEB promoted the event with an advertisement in the McKenzie River Reflections and social media posts.

Anyone with questions or to provide their feedback can go to eweb.org/leaburgbridge, call EWEB Generation Planner Jeremy Somogye at 541-685-7439, or email LeaburgInfo@eweb.org.