Scroll to view all answers or click to jump to a specific subject.
Topic Areas: Project Background & Alternatives | Water Quality | Project Cost & Timeline | About the New Plant | Why EWEB and SUB are Building Separate Plants | Related Projects
Project Background & Alternatives
Why is a second water source needed?
Eugene is one of the largest cities in the Pacific Northwest that relies on a single source of water, the McKenzie River. If something were to happen that shuts off our McKenzie drinking water supply, our community would have only about two to three days of stored water, which may not be enough in a major emergency.
Establishing a second source of water is critical for improving the reliability of our water system, especially following a disaster such as an earthquake, chemical spill or other incident that interrupts our primary McKenzie supply.
Why is the Willamette River the best option for a second water source?
EWEB has been studying and planning for a second water source for decades. Technical investigations, capacity studies, and risk and reliability assessments confirm that the Willamette River is the best option to provide Eugene with a second source of drinking water. The Willamette has excellent water quality and adequate supply to provide the amount of water needed to meet demand if something were to happen to the McKenzie.
EWEB has established water rights to draw up to 19 million gallons of water per day from the Willamette. Building a treatment plant on the Willamette would allow EWEB to safeguard these water rights for the people of Eugene for generations to come. There are operational benefits and efficiencies as well, as a new water treatment plant and transmission main can be readily connected to existing infrastructure.
Why can’t we just build more storage in the system?
EWEB currently has approximately 2-3 days worth of storage in the water system at any given time. Adding more storage has the potential to create water quality issues. As water is stored, the chlorine concentration decreases. Chlorine is what protects human health in a drinking water system. The current storage system is right sized to provide a comfortable buffer of backup water for emergencies and fire suppression, while also facilitating efficient turnover for normal daily usage.
Why can’t our interties with Springfield meet our needs?
The Springfield Utility Board (SUB) and EWEB’s water systems are connected by multiple interties. These interties are closed during normal circumstances but can be opened to provide water during emergency situations.
While interties can provide some short-term relief, they are not currently configured to be a sustained backup solution. EWEB is working with SUB to optimize the intertie system as an additional resiliency measure.
Water Quality
Is the Willamette River water safe?
Safe drinking water is our top priority. Regular water quality testing at the Willamette intake site since April 2013 indicates that the water quality at the Willamette River location is similar to samples taken at the McKenzie River intake for EWEB’s Hayden Bridge Plant.
Will the water taste good?
As proposed, the new treatment plant would have robust treatment processes able to treat all anticipated raw water conditions in the Willamette both with respect to water quality and taste/odor to a level higher than the existing Hayden Bridge Treatment Plant drawing from the McKenzie River.
Will the McKenzie and Willamette water be blended?
The new plant is expected to operate daily to ensure its reliability and operation when needed. This would mean some amount of blending in the system.
Project Cost & Timeline
How much will the project cost?
EWEB is developing a detailed design for the plant to determine a firm cost. Although we are planning to fund the addition of a second source through capital reserves and revenue bonds, EWEB is actively investigating other sources of funding.
How will the project impact customer rates?
Long term rate impacts will be calculated once we have a firm cost for the project.
When will construction begin?
EWEB will develop a construction schedule for the second source project after the design of the plant and additional analyses are completed.
About the New Plant
Where would the plant be located?
Under the proposed plans, EWEB would draw water from the Willamette just below the confluence of the Coast Fork and the Middle Fork. The treatment plant would be located in Glenwood, between the Willamette River and I-5.
Would the plant be built to modern seismic standards?
Yes. The plant and the pipeline connecting it to the EWEB system would be built to modern seismic standards to withstand the impacts of a large earthquake or other natural disaster.
Why EWEB and the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) are Building Separate Plants
Why are EWEB and SUB pursuing new treatment plants?
To help protect our communities from water supply disruptions, whether from natural disasters or other emerging pressures, both SUB and EWEB are looking to diversify their water sources. In addition, SUB is building capacity to meet an expected 48% increase in water demand over the next 50 years.
Why aren’t EWEB and SUB collaborating on a shared facility?
To meet supply and resiliency needs, SUB is building its treatment plant on the McKenzie River. Since EWEB needs a source separate from the McKenzie River, it does not make sense to join SUB’s effort.
EWEB already has a treatment plant on the McKenzie and SUB already has a treatment plant on the Middle Fork Willamette. Why can’t those facilities meet our communities’ needs?
The existing treatment plants were built before the risks of the Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake were fully known. While each utility has invested in upgrades, the existing facilities cannot be fully retrofitted to withstand a Cascadia Event. There are also broader system considerations, including future demand, operational flexibility, and the need for geographic redundancy, which make it impractical to rely on these facilities alone. The new treatment plants proposed by both utilities would address those concerns, and be built to modern seismic standards, adding two Cascadia-ready facilities to the region, significantly increasing local resiliency.
Wouldn’t shared facilities be a better option in the long term?
EWEB and SUB have been developing separate water systems since the cities they serve were founded. The systems have fundamental differences – like different operating pressures and different water sources – that make combining options complex and likely more expensive than remaining separate. Keeping systems independent also strengthens resiliency by providing flexibility during emergencies.
Are there other ways EWEB and SUB can work together to help ensure a resilient water supply if disruptions occur?
Yes. EWEB, SUB and Rainbow Water District have an agreement in place for operating existing water system interties. Interties are piping connections that allow smaller quantities of water to be shared on an emergency basis, but they cannot meet normal customer demand. All three utilities are currently working together on an intertie strategy and upgrades that should help address current limitations to sharing water between systems.
Related Projects
What other work is EWEB doing to improve the resiliency of our water system?
A second source is just one of many investments EWEB is making in drinking water infrastructure. We are also strengthening our base-level water storage, building new transmission mains, developing emergency water stations, and restoring and protecting the McKenzie watershed.
Where can I find the nearest Emergency Water Station to my home?
Learn more about the Emergency Water Stations here.
